Scope and Ambit of Powers Of Courts U/s 319 CrPC : Supreme Court Summarize Principles ... Case Title: Manjeet Singh v State of Haryana LL 2021 SC 398

 Scope and Ambit of Powers Of Courts U/s 319 CrPC : Supreme Court Summarize Principles ...

Case Title: Manjeet Singh v State of Haryana LL 2021 SC 398

The Supreme Court, in a judgment delivered on Tuesday 24th of August, 2021, summarized the scope and ambit of the powers of the Court under Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Even in a case where the stage of giving opportunity to the complainant to file a protest petition urging upon the trial Court to summon other persons as well as who were named in the FIR but not implicated in the charge-sheet has gone, in that case also, the court is still not powerless by virtue of Section 319 CrPC, the bench of Justices DY Chandrachud and MR Shah observed.

These observations were made in the appeal arising out of a murder case against the Trial Court's dismissal of the application under Section 319 CrPC and refusing to summon some persons to face the trial in exercising the powers under Section 319 CrPC. The High Court had upheld the Trial Court.

The bench, allowing the appeal, summarized the principles as follows:

1. While exercising the powers under Section 319 CrPC and to summon the persons not charge-sheeted, the entire effort is not to allow the real perpetrator of an offence to get away unpunished;

2. For the empowerment of the courts to ensure that the criminal administration of justice works properly;

3. The law has been properly codified and modified by the legislature under the CrPC indicating as to how the courts should proceed to ultimately find out the truth so that the innocent does not get punished but at the same time, the guilty are brought to book under the law;

4. to discharge duty of the court to find out the real truth and to ensure that the guilty does not go unpunished;

5. where the investigating agency for any reason does not array one of the real culprits as an accused, the court is not powerless in calling the said accused to face trial;

6. Section 319 CrPC allows the court to proceed against any person who is not an accused in a case before it;

7. the court is the sole repository of justice and a duty is cast upon it to uphold the rule of law and, therefore, it will be inappropriate to deny the existence of such powers with the courts in our criminal justice system where it is not uncommon that the real accused, at times, get away by manipulating the investigating and/or the prosecuting agency;

8. Section 319 CrPC is an enabling provision empowering the court to take appropriate steps for proceeding against any person not being an accused for also having committed the offence under trial;

9. the power under Section 319(1) CrPC can be exercised at any stage after the charge-sheet is filed and before the pronouncement of judgment, except during the stage of Sections 207/208 CrPC, committal, etc. which is only a pretrial stage intended to put the process into motion;

 10. the court can exercise the power under Section 319 CrPC only after the trial proceeds and commences with the recording of the evidence;

11. the word "evidence" in Section 319 CrPC means only such evidence as is made before the court, in relation to statements, and as produced before the court, in relation to documents; 

12. it is only such evidence that can be taken into account by the Magistrate or the court to decide whether the power under Section 319 CrPC is to be exercised and not on the basis of material collected during the investigation;

13. if the Magistrate/court is convinced even on the basis of evidence appearing in examination-in-chief, it can exercise the power under Section 319 CrPC and can proceed against such other person(s);

14. that the Magistrate/court is convinced even on the basis of evidence appearing in examination-in-chief, powers under Section 319 CrPC can be exercised;

15. that power under Section 319 CrPC can be exercised even at the stage of completion of examination-in-chief and the court need not has to wait till the said evidence is tested on cross-examination

Join & Share YouTube channel -@ravijeedio